From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: dry-run defunct Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 18:52:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20160717165201.GB26669@thebird.nl> References: <20160717103218.GA25877@thebird.nl> <20160717110535.GA9940@solar> <87d1mc4c2f.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOpLn-0002NZ-D2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 12:55:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOpLj-0006Cz-3t for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 12:55:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d1mc4c2f.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 03:40:56PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > I agree this isn=E2=80=99t great, but I=E2=80=99m not sure how to impro= ve on that. > (Nevertheless, it is better than answering the question based on > compile-time dependencies as was done before.) Grafts, I thought, an intermediate solution to prevent excessive rebuilds. Still, regularly we would rebuild everything, right? Or are we now grafting on grafting? Pj. --=20