From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-ess. Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 15:26:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20160710132610.GA11092@solar> References: <87h9c45jlq.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpl0kxvc.fsf@elephly.net> <87d1mrkw5d.fsf@gnu.org> <20160709193148.GB31432@solar> <87furhn5ee.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMEkW-0003su-8R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 09:26:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMEkR-0002gP-Tb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 09:26:19 -0400 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:30126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMEkR-0002g7-Gi for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 09:26:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87furhn5ee.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Roel Janssen Cc: guix-devel On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:39:37PM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote: > I was thinking about packaging the fonts separately, but I haven't at > all looked at whether that is a sane thing to do. Do you have a > particular list of packages where texlive-minimal fails to be sufficient > to build documentation, or can I generate that list by looking for the > texlive input? Well, instead of packaging fonts separately and adding them back to texlive-minimal, it should be enough to not delete them in the first place for the texlive-minimal package... I did not try to replace texlive for all packages where it is used for building documentation, and do not remember the list of packages I tried. I think I tried python-matplotlib and lilypond. Andreas