From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add perltidy. Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 21:01:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20160709190125.GA31432@solar> References: <87oa6c5uty.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLxVO-00028v-3T for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 15:01:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLxVK-0003JS-S6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 15:01:34 -0400 Received: from mailrelay2.public.one.com ([91.198.169.125]:42285) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLxVK-0003JE-Er for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 15:01:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel Hello, sorry for being late, but the number of messages on the list is simply overwhelming... On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 01:01:07PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > “perltidy” (as in the domain name) or “perl-tidy” (as in the tarball)? > I don’t remember what our naming guidelines say about this. (I think > “perltidy” is correct.) Is it a perl "module"? Then it should be named "perl-tidy": https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Perl-Modules.html#Perl-Modules If it is a perl "binary", then keeping the upstream name is the good solution. In this case, maybe the latter holds? There is a ready-to-use perl script, but also a file Tidy.pm. Andreas