From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add orage.
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:46:07 -0400
Message-ID: <20160627154607.GA22515@jasmine>
References: <20160510010952.075f9416@openmailbox.org>
	<87a8jwrjwv.fsf@elephly.net>
	<20160511113452.27bc3704@openmailbox.org>
	<20160523023407.GB22862@jasmine>
	<20160523180728.274691dc@openmailbox.org>
	<20160625173934.GB22624@jasmine> <87inwvepa9.fsf@openmailbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57544)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bHYjx-0005QY-98
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:46:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bHYju-0000Mk-5P
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:46:25 -0400
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:41022)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bHYjs-0000Kc-S9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:46:22 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87inwvepa9.fsf@openmailbox.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 03:14:06PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> > If this issue doesn't break the primary use case of Orage, or cause
> > problems besides the failure of 'View > Globaltime', then this issue
> > should not block packaging, in my opinion.
> 
> So I can push Orage and figure out the issue with globaltime later?

I think so, if it meets the conditions above.

Of course it would be best if it worked. I didn't find the globaltime
source but according to [0] it is part of Orage. Maybe it would be
helpful to run Orage with strace and see how it's failing.

[0]
http://linux.die.net/man/1/globaltime