From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: libgcrypt update to 1.7.1 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:59:23 +0000 Message-ID: <20160617185923.GA24906@khazad-dum> References: <20160615195328.GA13352@khazad-dum> <20160616154047.GC2245@jasmine> <20160616162825.GB29687@debian-netbook> <87d1nfvox7.fsf@gnu.org> <20160617174302.GA8255@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40091) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDyzQ-0005tk-04 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:59:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDyzL-00035Q-T0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:59:35 -0400 Received: from 93-95-228-168.1984.is ([93.95.228.168]:46096 helo=beleriand.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDyzL-00035J-Fq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:59:31 -0400 Received: by beleriand.n0.is (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 83b019a8 TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160617174302.GA8255@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-06-17(01:43:02-0400), Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:02:44PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > Efraim Flashner skribis: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:40:47AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:53:28PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > >> > * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (libgcrypt): Update to 1.7.1 > > >> > > >> This looks good to me. What branch should it go on? > > >> > > > > > > either core-updates or core-updates-next > > > > The latter please. :-) > > Okay, in that case, can you rebase it on core-updates, ng0? Otherwise is > won't apply cleanly due to trying to upgrade from 1.6.5 instad of 1.7.0. > This should be relatively easy when I have the gnupg branch still around, otherwise I'll recreate it. With the wording familiar to me yet sometimes not good to comprehend even when I hear and parse it correctly when talking: I should rebase the commit on the branch `core-updates` which currently is at version 1.6.5? -- =E2=99=A5=E2=92=B6 ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on psyced.org / loupsycedyglgamf.onion --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF4EARYKAAYFAldkSIoACgkQhhoAchyzrCAadAD+MXQA6ITXr4oMcCK1lweSIlaF St0uSAuaTG/COoGL5LABAOl+DDScZp3PMHfe+puTy3zeCa4Z0SsaG+y9tH4N0MgA =RKWt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--