From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Install gpg2 as gpg Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:50:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20160614135001.GC20115@jasmine> References: <20160613195538.GA1358@jasmine> <87ziqoezui.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCojV-0005pd-BM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:50:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCojQ-0001gF-4G for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:50:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ziqoezui.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:09:41PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > There was discussion of installing the gnupg-2.1 binaries 'gpg2' and > > 'gpgv2' as 'gpg' and 'gpgv' on the 'Trustable guix pull' thread [0]. [...] > > The configuration option does not exist for gnupg-2.0. > > Really? Then we should do the same by hand, I guess. Any volunteers? ;)