From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: boost: Allow for customizable build flags. Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:53:12 +0300 Message-ID: <20160614115312.GE10636@debian-netbook> References: <20160613130808.20143-1-dthompson2@worcester.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mrJd9p1Ce66CJMxE" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCmuP-0000AD-P3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:53:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCmuO-000691-Mw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:53:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: "Thompson, David" Cc: guix-devel , David Thompson --mrJd9p1Ce66CJMxE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 07:41:31AM -0400, Thompson, David wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Ricardo Wurmus > wrote: > > > > David Thompson writes: > > > >> From: David Thompson > >> > >> * gnu/packages/boost.scm (boost)[arguments]: Extract build flags to #:= make-flags argument. > > > > If I understand correctly, this moves the let-bound =E2=80=9Cbuild-flag= s=E2=80=9D to > > regular make-flags and reuses the default mechanism for passing > > make-flags, right? >=20 > Yes, exactly. With it I can easily create things like a statically > linked variant. >=20 > ~283 packages will need to rebuilt with this change, so maybe > core-updates would be a good place to put this? Or would it be > core-updates-next? I'm not sure anymore. :) >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > - Dave >=20 I would toss it into core-updates and hope Ludo doesn't notice :). I don't think it's quite reached building out that far yet so it should be ok. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --mrJd9p1Ce66CJMxE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXX/AkAAoJEPTB05F+rO6TK8cP/Ax03gILzYKrOjTBD2a+9EY6 9+EYuuFHarhJCaA3akiOlfdrJmWZ8I96cvsy6zXCLxIFORXjbW/LkSGpzmqsZTir AkKaUtAo4c5q+0gOMIuT5H1LURkcWZIQwVsQZdgBqMYAzdf7EOmuXXtj/Az/SO1d RA92Nl/Me2u6eSoBDWoJ5I2ocP+/BFqaP/ZezlN5tvq5OsXOFWCzCmCby6fIPyEr QrFVgRMyDsbOPaWjuEusZSheDuO6DF3fombBKaA9If1XiISDv5BJZ1LHTyiAMhyv 1DMWm6AuI6/eLl+iN1bFvcaqSImLIBZm5Vq3SyfuDdQ0SRsMtXFld/kdzBNLwTyt Hg3EGo63qw08efl9glYVuBDXOTeIJBRBb+NrbGt3j/wF/Q50X8G3Ft90E2zKv1L5 l/1zPynvrlHuMiCo1Ei7fvEZoJDEJjz3HLjJ0HV6wGDNMAZ4FXbDP1ulkUNj6zKQ hV2mTPqAjkXvKqMIAAFy6s/nZEmDAyaUq9pYEWAkcMIzAkC6xvemBbpLueFEhfQG hgUTPgLBYvVlydMdt4EqN6Uj/+qYXrFTpLbSkoBSy3rE+pQZGlvTTFwo6NDlX1yo KzFKrghUqopFfMeQNmIpiLztvzTmhXwbFaKlL1ODs9YfFK1aT2rSrF9DkM0MkXfc iJTHwZOBMZkKTOSWKETr =DIrV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mrJd9p1Ce66CJMxE--