Re: qt: monolithic or modular?

[Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1211 bytes --]

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 11:15:59AM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 10:24:18AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > To be fair, it was only the arm build that took 3.5 hours, i686 and
> > x86_64 both took about an hour.
> 
> What took 3,5 hours was the "evaluation" on hydra: The time between the
> moment I made hydra look at wip-qt, and the moment the first compilation
> of a package started, and this at a time where hydra had nothing else
> to do. So I do not think it makes sense to continue working in the wip-qt
> branch on hydra and to evaluate it ever so often, even more so since so far
> nothing depends on it and we will for the time being keep the monolithic
> qt-5; you may as well work locally as for other packages.
> 

Ok, I wasn't aware that it took hydra that long to actually start
working on the next package set.

> By the way, dropping the examples made for a factor of 2 in the compilation
> time; a nice improvement!
> 
> Andreas
> 

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]