From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Trying to build latest Icedtea / Java 6 [security update] Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 18:52:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20160531225234.GA19511@jasmine> References: <20160530045937.GA32652@jasmine> <87pos2ca7z.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53906) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7sWq-00045N-MU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 18:52:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7sWm-0001TI-OH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 18:52:52 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:34522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7sWl-0001L2-EA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 18:52:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pos2ca7z.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:13:04PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > Icedtea 1.13.11 was released, which fixes a number of security bugs: > > > > http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2016/05/04/security-icedtea-1-13-11-for-openjdk-6-released/ > > > > I tried to build it with the attached patch, but it fails for me. I've > > attached the tail of the build log. Any advice? > > The patch looks good to me. If I understand correctly this may be > because we’re bootstrapping with GCJ, which implements Java 1.5. You > can see in the log that “javac” runs with “-source 1.5 -target 5”, which > means that it assumes that the code is written in compliance with Java > 1.5. Maybe this file simply is not valid Java 1.5. > > According to http://stackoverflow.com/a/8697805/519736 “@Override” is > interpreted more strictly in 1.5. I don’t know much about Java and I > haven’t looked at the sources in question, but I guess there are > “@Override” annotations above the five method declarations. We might be > able to just remove them. > > I think this should be reported to Andrew; looks like a bug as > bootstrapping with GCJ should work for OpenJDK 6. Done: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2990