From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add libiax
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 17:02:42 -0400
Message-ID: <20160531210242.GC19631@jasmine>
References: <87shx17pbq.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160529004847.GA9375@jasmine>
	<87fuszwcno.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160531190221.GA21454@solar>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54805)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1b7qoT-00059z-Jx
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 17:03:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1b7qoO-0002os-DS
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 17:02:56 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:39197)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1b7qoN-0002jZ-77
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 17:02:52 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160531190221.GA21454@solar>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:02:21PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> just a quick comment on the name:
> 
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:47:55PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> > Upstream seems to refer to the software as "iax" "libiax" and "libiax2"
> > interchangeably.  The "2" was the closest thing I could find to a version
> > number.
> 
> notice that the tarball name is always "correct" as the package name, unless
> upstream consistently uses a different name. In this case:
> 
> +           "https://gitlab.savoirfairelinux.com/sflphone/libiax2/"
> +           "repository/archive.tar.gz?ref="
> 
> I would suggest to use "libiax2" as the package name (variable name and
> package NAME field), and the version number as proposed by Leo.

Okay, so let's change the naming to libiax2, and give some more detail
about the licensing, as shown in my patch from earlier today. Then we
should be ready to merge :)