On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:25:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:50:02PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote: > > * gnu/packages/telephony.scm (libiax): New variable. > > > + (license lgpl2.0)))) > > In my final review, I found that some source files are licensed under > the GPL (no version specified) as well as one public-domain file. The > details are in the attached patch revision. > > Since I don't understand the fine points of these things, I ask the > group: can a source distribution be LGPL 2.0 and include GPL components? I saw it explained another time that if the license is just "GPL" then we can read it as we see fit, which usually means GPL3+ (for those portions). -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted