On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:59:14AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote: John Darrington writes: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote: > * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Rename texlive.scm to tex.scm. > * gnu/packages/texlive.scm: Rename file to tex.scm. > * gnu/packages/tex.scm: Renamed from texlive.scm. > * gnu/packages/algebra.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/docbook.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/engineering.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/gettext.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/lisp.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/maths.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/music.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/plotutils.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/python.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/scheme.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > > What is the purpose of doing that? I thought that texlive was the chosen > name that the project had. > > I think there are a few other implementations of TeX in the wild (though > mostly unmaintained). Furthermore, I think Knuth has a trademark on the word "tex". > > J' See this thread: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-05/msg00702.html I want to add Texmaker (an editor for TeX). Putting it in texlive.scm wouldn't really fit because it's not part of Texlive. So, the idea is to put everything TeX-related into one file (tex.scm). Oh I see. I thought you were renaming the package itself, not the file in which its definition resides (saying "Rename texlive.scm to tex.scm" would have made this clearer). J' -- Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encryted email. PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.