From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add ledger. Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 22:49:37 -0400 Message-ID: <20160514024937.GA15206@jasmine> References: <1462648816.1139014.601038209.3A886EEC@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20160507222330.GA16592@jasmine> <1462673448.1215366.601202601.6F8B62D7@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20160509033906.GC25977@jasmine> <8737prou9x.fsf@gnu.org> <20160509210103.GB15057@jasmine> <1463023686.3455318.605409553.05451A73@webmail.messagingengine.com> <878tzf1vxu.fsf@gmail.com> <1463070674.3638408.605951137.5C3DB897@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87posp7oqa.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43181) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1PeL-0004TZ-OG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 22:49:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1PeH-0005sA-F7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 22:49:52 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:41835) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1PeG-0005oY-2C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 22:49:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87posp7oqa.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:16:29PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > Alex Griffin (2016-05-12 19:31 +0300) wrote: > > Yes, it builds fine for me. It looks like the important line in your > > build log is "c++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)", > > which could be from running out of memory. Does it still happen if you > > add `#:parallel-build? #f` to the build system arguments? > > Oh indeed, if parallel-build is disabled, it is built successfully. > Thank you (and Leo)! > > So I don't know, should ‘#:parallel-build? #f’ be used in the final > package recipe? I guess not, as it looks like a problem on my side (not > enough memory for parallel-build). My opinion is that 3 or 4 GB is not a very small amount of RAM for a personal computer. I think that allowing users with "only" 4 GB RAM to build our ledger package is worth it taking twice as long for the rest of us. Or, users with ≤ 4 GB RAM could make a private variant of ledger that disables parallel building. We sometimes suggest that users with esoteric requirements or restrictions do something like this, but I don't think this is one of those cases. Thoughts?