[PATCH 0/1] Nginx: Update to 1.10.0

[PATCH 0/1] Nginx: Update to 1.10.0

[Leo Famulari]

There is a new stable release of Nginx: 1.10.0:

http://nginx.org/en/download.html

Take a look at the changes to see if there are any new features we
should enable. HTTP/2? The changes are in the 1.9.* updates:

http://nginx.org/en/CHANGES-1.10

Leo Famulari (1):
  gnu: nginx: Update to 1.10.0.

 gnu/packages/web.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 1/1] gnu: nginx: Update to 1.10.0.

[Leo Famulari]

* gnu/packages/web.scm (nginx): Update to 1.10.0.
---
 gnu/packages/web.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/web.scm b/gnu/packages/web.scm
index a0e1ec9..0c2798f 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/web.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/web.scm
@@ -109,14 +109,14 @@ and its related documentation.")
 (define-public nginx
   (package
     (name "nginx")
-    (version "1.8.1")
+    (version "1.10.0")
     (source (origin
               (method url-fetch)
               (uri (string-append "http://nginx.org/download/nginx-"
                                   version ".tar.gz"))
               (sha256
                (base32
-                "1dwpyw4pvhj68vxramqxm8f79pqz9lrm8mvifbn49h3615ikqjwg"))))
+                "0kdyqa5xaxvhz6y75ixs05mzygk3kszzdq5h0gnlrg35vp1lgmlf"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (inputs `(("pcre" ,pcre)
               ("openssl" ,openssl)
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH 0/1] Nginx: Update to 1.10.0

[Ludovic Courtès]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> There is a new stable release of Nginx: 1.10.0:
>
> http://nginx.org/en/download.html
>
> Take a look at the changes to see if there are any new features we
> should enable. HTTP/2? The changes are in the 1.9.* updates:
>
> http://nginx.org/en/CHANGES-1.10

If there are no major incompatibilities, which seems to be the case, I’d
say go for it.

What do the other Web-savvy folks think?  David, Chris, Mark, …?

Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH 0/1] Nginx: Update to 1.10.0

[Leo Famulari]

On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:21:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> 
> > There is a new stable release of Nginx: 1.10.0:
> >
> > http://nginx.org/en/download.html
> >
> > Take a look at the changes to see if there are any new features we
> > should enable. HTTP/2? The changes are in the 1.9.* updates:
> >
> > http://nginx.org/en/CHANGES-1.10
> 
> If there are no major incompatibilities, which seems to be the case, I’d
> say go for it.

Well, it didn't seem to require any changes to mirror.conf ;)

> What do the other Web-savvy folks think?  David, Chris, Mark, …?

Re: [PATCH 0/1] Nginx: Update to 1.10.0

[Ludovic Courtès]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:21:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
>> 
>> > There is a new stable release of Nginx: 1.10.0:
>> >
>> > http://nginx.org/en/download.html
>> >
>> > Take a look at the changes to see if there are any new features we
>> > should enable. HTTP/2? The changes are in the 1.9.* updates:
>> >
>> > http://nginx.org/en/CHANGES-1.10
>> 
>> If there are no major incompatibilities, which seems to be the case, I’d
>> say go for it.
>
> Well, it didn't seem to require any changes to mirror.conf ;)

Perfect.  :-)  So I think you can go ahead.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH 0/1] Nginx: Update to 1.10.0

[Leo Famulari]

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 01:40:42PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> 
> > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:21:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> >> 
> >> > There is a new stable release of Nginx: 1.10.0:
> >> >
> >> > http://nginx.org/en/download.html
> >> >
> >> > Take a look at the changes to see if there are any new features we
> >> > should enable. HTTP/2? The changes are in the 1.9.* updates:
> >> >
> >> > http://nginx.org/en/CHANGES-1.10
> >> 
> >> If there are no major incompatibilities, which seems to be the case, I’d
> >> say go for it.
> >
> > Well, it didn't seem to require any changes to mirror.conf ;)
> 
> Perfect.  :-)  So I think you can go ahead.

Done, as 04d1a0dc0!