From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Gnome-updates Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:37:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20160426173717.GA4754@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35147) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1av6vQ-0007mC-2L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:37:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1av6vL-0004ax-3I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:37:27 -0400 Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:50193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1av6vK-0004Zq-Nm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:37:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi all, the gnome-updates branch has built on x86, and compared to master, there are not that many regressions: http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/108921?compare=master#tabs-now-fail I saw a few that seem to be related to fonts and freetype, but I am not a specialist. Do you think we could nevertheless merge back to master? In any case, it would be nice if people who are competent in these matters could have a look at the few remaining build failures. Andreas