From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add gnome-tweak-tool.
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 21:35:47 -0400
Message-ID: <20160416013547.GC12389@jasmine>
References: <87vb3z3q89.fsf@drakenvlieg.flower>
	<20160411233524.GA11228@jasmine>
	<87lh4hs7yx.fsf@drakenvlieg.flower>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44646)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1arF92-0001ck-JV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 21:35:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1arF8x-0001eS-Iu
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 21:35:32 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:48614)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1arF8x-0001eA-Fl
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 21:35:27 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87lh4hs7yx.fsf@drakenvlieg.flower>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, rennes@openmailbox.org, =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= <iyzsong@gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:02:14PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:

Thanks for making the ther requested changes.

> Leo Famulari writes:
> >> +    (propagated-inputs
> >> +     `(("gobject-introspection" ,gobject-introspection)
> >> +       ("gnome-shell" ,gnome-shell)
> >> +       ("gsettings-desktop-schemas" ,gsettings-desktop-schemas)
> >> +       ("gtk+" ,gtk+)
> >> +       ("libnotify" ,libnotify)
> >> +       ("mutter" ,mutter)
> >> +       ("python2" ,python-2)
> >> +       ("python2-pygobject" ,python2-pygobject)))
> >
> > Oof, do we really have to propagate python-2 (and the others)?
> 
> Yes... I experimented with moving any of these to plain inputs,
> gnome-tweak-tool crashes on missing gir features.

I tried building with glib-or-gtk-build-system instead of
gnu-build-system. It still didn't work if python-2 was a mere input, but
I wonder if glib-or-gtk-build-system should be used, regardless?

I wonder if 宋文武 has any thoughts about this issue?

Perhaps it's not a problem to propagate python-2 at the system level
(which is where I think GNOME tools would normally be)?

Maybe we should use a wrapper instead of propagating python-2?