From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: pcmanfm version update Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:49:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20160414004940.GA8131@jasmine> References: <87shyvrww4.fsf@gmail.com> <71ca60a5ce463ec85842355bdf5d86c6@openmailbox.org> <87bn5i4u2u.fsf@gmail.com> <20160409171958.GA25062@solar> <20160409195903.GC7587@debian-netbook> <20160410010619.GB29029@jasmine> <878u0hci21.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqVTJ-0006qe-F6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:49:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqVTE-0005np-RN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:49:25 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:43994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqVTE-0005nV-Nu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:49:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878u0hci21.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex Kost , rain1@openmailbox.org On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:31:02PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 10:59:03PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > >> We do have some packages that have to be updated together, acme and > >> letsencrypt, python-cryptography and python-cryptography-vectors. But > >> those do have a commit message that they are updated together. Python-cryptography-vectors is a test suite for python-cryptography [0]. I think it wouldn't be wrong for them to be integrated into the python-cryptography package if they are not used elsewhere. > > If those packages were updated separately, the build would break after > > the first commit. Neither of those package pairs works if the versions > > are not in sync [0]. > > > > In my opinion, that is a valid reason for updating multiple packages in > > the same commit. > > If that is the case (I wouldn’t be surprised), I agree it’s a valid > reason. I tried it, and pcmanfm 1.2.4 at least built successfully against libfm 1.2.3. But, pcmanfm only ran tests in the 'po' translations directory, where they warn about use of a deprecated regex syntax. > Anyway, it’s no big deal, so we shouldn’t block otherwise > uncontroversial and non-disrupting patches for 1 week just because of > this IMO. True, we got sidetracked. Sorry for the delay, Raymond! Applied as 58f738a1c8. [0] https://cryptography.io/en/latest/development/test-vectors/