From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: pcmanfm version update Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 19:19:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20160409171958.GA25062@solar> References: <87shyvrww4.fsf@gmail.com> <71ca60a5ce463ec85842355bdf5d86c6@openmailbox.org> <87bn5i4u2u.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aowYJ-0006V9-3Z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 13:20:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aowYF-0004J0-U0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 13:20:07 -0400 Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:54223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aowYF-0004HJ-Hv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 13:20:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bn5i4u2u.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, rain1@openmailbox.org On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:37:13PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > But these are 2 different packages from 2 different sources, so I still > think it makes sense to update them in 2 commits. I hope other people > tell what is preferable here on their opinions, thanks. Yes, we always work on one package at a time. Andreas