From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: [v3] Erlang Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:56:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20160409105649.GA24708@thebird.nl> References: <20160401081911.GA16368@thebird.nl> <20160402022054.GA17152@jasmine> <8737r2bcyv.fsf@gnu.org> <20160404033924.GA28101@jasmine> <20160404082802.GA29212@thebird.nl> <20160404165012.GA11014@jasmine> <20160404174944.GA12477@jasmine> <20160404181506.GA32004@thebird.nl> <20160405100228.GA3237@thebird.nl> <20160405184642.GA7774@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoqbA-0007Ce-SB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:58:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoqb7-0006li-L5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:58:40 -0400 Received: from mail.thebird.nl ([95.154.246.10]:43826) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoqb7-0006le-Fi for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:58:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160405184642.GA7774@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:46:42PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:02:28PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote: > > I received a nice reply from Joe Armstrong. Basically he agrees with > > the idea of deterministic builds and hashes for content of source > > files > > > > http://joearms.github.io/2015/03/12/The_web_of_names.html > > > > and will support us if we raise our issue on the mailing list. Leo, do > > you want to have a go - essentially sending the E-mail I wrote to Joe? > > I can do it if you want me to. > > I'm more than happy to test things, but I think it's best if you send > the message since you are actually using Erlang. But like I said before, > if it's too much of a burden, I'll do it. Please let me know! A quick update: the Erlang authors are going to fix this issue as can be followed in http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2016-April/088721.html Pj. --