From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
Subject: Re: [GSoC] Porting GuixSD to GNU Hurd draft
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:30:14 +0100
Message-ID: <20160324143014.4503.9492@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>
References: <20160206113802.GA17867@thebird.nl> <8760x5gpif.fsf@inria.fr>
	<20160302101227.GF2815@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> <87a8mgefcy.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160302220654.GC3037@var.home> <56EFE480.6020007@gmail.com>
	<878u19wbvt.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160323165550.2708.70954@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>
	<874mbw2eoi.fsf@gnu.org> <56F3F1D3.6000203@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-hurd-bounces+gnu-bug-hurd=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <56F3F1D3.6000203@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-hurd>,
	<mailto:bug-hurd-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-hurd@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-hurd-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd>,
	<mailto:bug-hurd-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-hurd-bounces+gnu-bug-hurd=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-hurd-bounces+gnu-bug-hurd=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Manolis Ragkousis <manolis837@gmail.com>, =?utf-8?q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org

Hi,

Quoting Manolis Ragkousis (2016-03-24 14:55:31)
> On 03/24/16 15:22, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> >>> The main question is whether you should implement build isolation in
> >>> guix-daemon, in which case that would leave little time for the GuixSD
> >>> parts.  I think I would rather let you focus on the GuixSD stuff as y=
ou
> >>> wrote, but I=E2=80=99d like to hear what the Hurd folks think.
> >>
> >> I consider isolation more important.
> > =

> > OK.
> =

> Isolation first it is then.
> =

> > So, Manolis, what about reframing the agenda such that porting
> > guix-daemon to GNU/Hurd comes first (I=E2=80=99d consider it roughly ha=
lf of the
> > programming effort), followed by GuixSD stuff?
> > =

> =

> Current objectives then:
> 1) Achieve build isolation in the daemon on the Hurd.
> 2) Modify Guix so it can produce a working image, while isolating any
> cases of Linux assumptions.
> 3) Boot to GuixSD

Well, I didn't ment to stomp over your priorities like that, it is just
that I personally consider it more important and from my point of view
it should be easier to achieve.

Justus