From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] gnu: Add borg. Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:49:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20160323204950.GC21191@debian-netbook> References: <14fe75ec9c8b651be6a5240dd5444e558615e1e1.1457998381.git.leo@famulari.name> <878u1k2jik.fsf@gmail.com> <20160315091845.GA9602@jasmine> <20160321213115.GA2717@jasmine> <20160321223519.GA6523@jasmine> <20160321225259.GA7558@jasmine> <87mvpqtgbu.fsf@gmail.com> <20160322212525.GB13372@jasmine> <87a8lp3927.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wxDdMuZNg1r63Hyj" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aipj4-0004cP-0S for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:49:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aipiz-0001SC-Vl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:49:57 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:57649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aipiz-0001S8-P5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:49:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a8lp3927.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --wxDdMuZNg1r63Hyj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:14:24AM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > Leo Famulari (2016-03-23 00:25 +0300) wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:20:37PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > [...] > >> The rest looks good to me, so if you checked that this program works, I > >> think you can push this patchset. > > > > I've been using this program for a few months without problems (yes, I > > do restore from time to time). > > > > It's being developed very rapidly for something so critical as a backup > > program, so I think that it's still a bit experimental. I could allude > > to that in the description. What do you think? >=20 > I don't know :-) Do what seems appropriate to you, I think it will be > OK in any case. >=20 I've been using attic for about 2 months. I checked the github and it looks like they've recently hit their 1.0.0 release, and they've commited to keeping API-compatability to at least 2.0. If their software is as widely used and developed upon as they say it is, their own developer-users won't likely break their own backup chain easily/lightly. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --wxDdMuZNg1r63Hyj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW8wFuAAoJEPTB05F+rO6TcvIQAIw0L9qfCiAZYp8pYUEJB0xA sFVIFtub9i4wvcutPgMcXHH+ohRugfsIYQHoRN8MuToDSD3fDFFFimr3hFCpHSuG xY7lidg3XBUeg/wO6kURausWo+zU4a+xnU21ObwbI8+7PXfnwhIU1WDJopA3Huus C6wZ/Laqy4ifJj+dn2rl1Ub/zp7+vHfVMMKKMTNTJOf4P8RG7B8oqzLVhbv+u0RF obFtgISZ8iN/aTaPMtGNfVpCPZP+US2DRv/FpXQ49DA9ZFBgTpW0DtMXyt4uHYI/ b/xrtSThCd95h401px+okdSjjrtO6XwIqwkyZjTXJXtcjDPORFGw3kBIFUWCbYsf l9wPp6T3/EE12RerjUm7H4oXUoGnlWnrDko4xZ7g7tL2iyyDJzTOkaBTXYE18eWP O6rxUfpNVi/tPUXU6O8eVMil2D5ypiFZqrgilJaCDu8gshvoIsDDoq3xEOaCAjyq 51tvIelEyMbGTItP2sanJHXqTqrqgLn3mujcgUVUAVqET0p0kqKUI0u18kj3d+7Y f7nTCHLUNyVzBdNYEpeVgJM3w6jbKgi8NQXHIQjwBqHW2E1K0znly4yleBHbIvZT 9ph7hqeE9pKC5UgFbmopIdIXhmueB/L0P07t/or8jfnVC3Brn63Kj3IvaXFVEOvV PlglAZeOpRoHBn9Tq/D1 =6NO+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wxDdMuZNg1r63Hyj--