From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jookia <166291@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnunet-gtk: adds --with-gnunet to configure-flags Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 02:47:39 +1100 Message-ID: <20160308154739.GA9897@novena-choice-citizen.lan> References: <87oaapx2kd.fsf@grrlz.net> <87twkh81r0.fsf@grrlz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60469) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <166291@gmail.com>) id 1adJsb-0005C4-MR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:49:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <166291@gmail.com>) id 1adJsW-0004M6-2g for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:49:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]:38756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <166291@gmail.com>) id 1adJsV-0004Lf-RP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:48:56 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l68so33375393wml.1 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 07:48:55 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87twkh81r0.fsf@grrlz.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nils Gillmann Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:48:03PM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote: > Following later this week: > > gnunet + gnunet-gtk SVN, co-authored work with Jookia. > > I'll ask on gnunet-dev about this, but it might be that we have > to decide wether to default to some svn of gnunet, as 0.10.1 is > really old. Stable, but old.. Which possibly could affect the > experience for people who try to use gnunet now, before any > applications like secushare are running on it. plus you need -svn > if you want to hack on or testrun application which develop on > top of / inside gnunet. > > Guix should provide a stable experience, but if stable means too > old to deliver a useable experience of an still in development > network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and > gnunet-gtk, I would just make gnunet-svn the default (gnunet will > default to gnunet-svn) and gnunet-0.10.1 will have to be > installed explicitly. > There are only a few open bugs until the next GNUnet release will > be done, but 0.10.1 is just terribly old. > > what do you think? To add on this, the network and executables as of SVN are incompatible with the network as of v0.10.1. This may be a barrier to compatibility. Jookia.