From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Remove an unused patch? Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 13:49:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20160306124942.GA13209@solar> References: <20160305161456.GA25823@solar> <87si041tcg.fsf@gnu.org> <20160305220840.GA22695@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34620) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acY88-0004CM-BG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 07:49:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acY85-0000BU-6x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 07:49:52 -0500 Received: from mailrelay2.public.one.com ([91.198.169.125]:51474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acY84-0000BF-RN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 07:49:49 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160305220840.GA22695@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 05:08:40PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > To make it more clear, what do you think about renaming the patch so it > doesn't refer to cpio, and adding references to Rush and Dico in the > patch? Yes, I was thinking the same. But this is a very singular case, and now everybody is aware of it, so it is maybe not necessary, but would still be helpful. I checked whether we could simply update dico and rush, but there are no new versions. Andreas