From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: btrfs-progs: Update to 4.4.1. Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 22:44:37 -0500 Message-ID: <20160304034437.GA2484@jasmine> References: <1456532224-4661-1-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com> <20160227224142.5941a0ef@debian-netbook> <20160227232746.GA6690@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abgfV-0004m4-Qh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:44:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abgfQ-00009h-Qx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:44:45 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:36311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abgfQ-00009d-Mb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:44:40 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 04:08:01AM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > On 28/02/2016, Leo Famulari wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > >> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 01:17:04 +0100 > >> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > >> > >> > * gnu/packages/linux.scm (btrfs-progs): Update to 4.4.1. > > > >> looks good to me! > >> > >> applied in 9c7f7e2d. > > > > Thanks for keeping up with this pcakage, Tobias! > > > > Have you had a chance to investigate how to include it in the initrd? > > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-02/msg00489.html > [Lynx won't let me remove lines. Nice. At least I'm on GuixSD] > > Hullo Leo, > > Sorry, not yet. I've had no free time lately. I hope the > coming week will bring some. Either way, 0.9.1 won't yet > have much butter in it. > > I'll try writing a static package expression before diving > into the initrd, which I'm guessing is quite different from > that of your average Linux distribution... Okay, feel free to share your work as you go! I'll probably make an attempt as well, although I can't say exactly when.