From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: GSoC ideas Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 23:06:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20160302220654.GC3037@var.home> References: <20160206113802.GA17867@thebird.nl> <87mvre2eyz.fsf@gnu.org> <56BC7496.8020409@gmail.com> <8760x5gpif.fsf@inria.fr> <20160302101227.GF2815@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> <87a8mgefcy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a8mgefcy.fsf@gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-hurd-bounces+gnu-bug-hurd=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-hurd-bounces+gnu-bug-hurd=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org, Manolis Ragkousis List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org Ludovic Court=E8s, on Wed 02 Mar 2016 22:31:41 +0100, wrote: > Samuel Thibault skribis: > > It can both help and hurt. Roland's concern is that we will probably = not > > want to provide a mount() that behaves like Linux, because in some ca= ses > > it may just not even make sense. So the "ported" software that would = try > > to use it would just fail. >=20 > Do you have examples of GNU/Linux uses that would make no sense? I haven't investigated, I just report what kind of fear Roland was having. Samuel