From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: libwnck Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 16:40:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20160228154054.GA27048@solar> References: <20160223113138.GA19907@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aa3Sx-00021Q-IF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:41:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aa3St-0005sK-J0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:41:03 -0500 Received: from mailrelay2.public.one.com ([91.198.169.125]:14445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aa3St-0005sG-7B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:40:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160223113138.GA19907@solar> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:31:38PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > However, the first one is internally assigned to the variable "libwnck-1". > I assume that someone got inspired by another case where the "-1" is actually > a version number. Is it okay if I rename it to "libwnck-2"? Done in commit dbb7a08. Andreas