From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Staying on top of Qt security Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:04:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20160225090430.GA21236@solar> References: <20160214200143.GA19744@jasmine> <20160225083545.GA21159@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYrqg-0000fS-H2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 04:04:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYrqd-0002Q7-Ao for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 04:04:38 -0500 Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:15284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYrqc-0002Q2-Uz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 04:04:35 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160225083545.GA21159@solar> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:35:45AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > I find it unlikely that an application would need both of gtk+ and qt. Maybe I am wrong; jalv does depend on both... It creates binaries jalv.gtk and jalv.qt. If nobody uses the qt version, we could remove the input qt-4. Andreas