From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Don't use guix build utils Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:16:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20160218201600.GA3818@solar> References: <1455379675-27516-1-git-send-email-mail@cbaines.net> <1455379675-27516-3-git-send-email-mail@cbaines.net> <20160213223918.GB1176@jasmine> <56C4BBC2.7070103@cbaines.net> <20160218001523.GB26345@jasmine> <20160218195505.GB3445@solar> <56C62292.1090701@cbaines.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWUzh-0000dx-TT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:16:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWUze-0004zF-NC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:16:09 -0500 Received: from mailrelay2.public.one.com ([91.198.169.125]:51950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWUze-0004yl-B2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:16:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C62292.1090701@cbaines.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Christopher Baines Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 07:59:14PM +0000, Christopher Baines wrote: > You can find it here [1], I have also attached it to this email. Okay, thanks. I have added a "." to the tag line of the commit message and dropped the line "needed for vcsh tests"; we can package it in its own right. I also modified the description a bit, it should consist of complete sentences. Now before I push, I am just a bit confused that it is supposed to be a thin wrapper around "ExtUtils::Command", but that we do not have perl-extutils-command in our distribution, and even if we had, it is not present as an input or probably even propagated input. Nevertheless, it compiles and passes its tests. What did I overlook? Andreas