From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm.
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:22:56 +0100
Message-ID: <20160214142256.GB6684@debian>
References: <20160212123141.GB14324@thebird.nl>
	<20160212125719.GA14615@thebird.nl>
	<20160213085940.GA18223@thebird.nl> <20160213102825.GA19194@debian>
	<20160213164257.GA19241@thebird.nl>
	<20160213170119.GA19344@thebird.nl> <20160213172001.GA3956@debian>
	<20160213201337.GA9218@jasmine> <20160213203422.GA13890@debian>
	<20160213204055.GA10236@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57229)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1aUxZr-0006Xb-7f
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:23:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1aUxZn-0008Hg-7l
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:23:07 -0500
Received: from mailrelay2.public.one.com ([91.198.169.125]:19356)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1aUxZm-0008Ha-Qd
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:23:03 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160213204055.GA10236@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:40:55PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> If that is it, then I believe git should "do the right thing" when
> generating patches. I've noticed that it progressively sets the encoding
> based on the minimum required to encode the characters in the patch.

The last line of your diffoscope shows that Pjotr's patch was encoded
in iso-8559-1, while all the scheme files in guix are in utf-8. It seems
quite clear to me that this is the reason for our problems. And apparently,
the git version plays a role in this.

Andreas