From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Massive graph Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:22:04 -0500 Message-ID: <20160213232204.GA2809@jasmine> References: <20160213164723.GB19241@thebird.nl> <87a8n4tfyl.fsf@elephly.net> <20160213223011.GA20723@thebird.nl> <20160213224517.GE1176@jasmine> <56BFB898.8010700@uq.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37593) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUjVr-0006rw-1m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:22:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUjVn-0000sv-Ss for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:22:03 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:50053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUjVn-0000sq-NH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:21:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56BFB898.8010700@uq.edu.au> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ben Woodcroft Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 09:13:28AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > > > On 14/02/16 08:45, Leo Famulari wrote: > >On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 11:30:11PM +0100, Pjotr Prins wrote: > >>On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 11:15:14PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >>>Pjotr Prins writes: > >>> > >>>>I am packaging the software that makes up http://genenetwork.org/. > >>>> > >>>> http://biobeat.org/gn2.svg > >>>Woah! Nice how this gets close to the complexity of gene networks, > >>>e.g. this one: http://www.john.ranola.org/Files/RadNetFull.pdf > >>We could do a hair-ball of the full Guix repository at some point :) > >I've killed `dot` after several minutes of trying to render a really > >large graph in PNG format. I wonder if it's up to the task! > From memory of probably outdated versions, svg output is much more > efficient, maybe give that a go. I noticed it was a lot easier on my web browser! I will use it in the future. > > ben