From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm. Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 21:34:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20160213203422.GA13890@debian> References: <20160212122042.GA14275@thebird.nl> <20160212123010.GA6019@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> <20160212123141.GB14324@thebird.nl> <20160212125719.GA14615@thebird.nl> <20160213085940.GA18223@thebird.nl> <20160213102825.GA19194@debian> <20160213164257.GA19241@thebird.nl> <20160213170119.GA19344@thebird.nl> <20160213172001.GA3956@debian> <20160213201337.GA9218@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUgtk-0000AC-V4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:34:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUgtg-0002vj-0b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:34:32 -0500 Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:10381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUgtf-0002vP-JR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:34:27 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160213201337.GA9218@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:13:37PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > I used diffoscope to compare the non-working patch and a "should-be" > identical patch that I generated locally. The only differences were in > the patch headers and the encoding of the file (UTF-8 vs ISO-8859-1). I think that explains it: The non-working part of the patch was the copyright line, which contains the copyright symbol! So let us all move to utf-8! Andreas