From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add tcllib. Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:05:30 -0500 Message-ID: <20160212230530.GA28826@jasmine> References: <87vb5xeiw8.fsf@gnu.org> <20160211215347.0aac83dd@debian-netbook> <87wpqbc5qs.fsf@gnu.org> <20160212051914.GA32278@jasmine> <20160212052937.GA2856@jasmine> <878u2pdh2e.fsf@gnu.org> <20160212222322.GA27022@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48394) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUMmG-00047e-JP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:05:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUMmF-0005Qd-0D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:05:28 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:46158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUMmD-0005Ps-NS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:05:26 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160212222322.GA27022@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:23:22PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:33:29PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Leo Famulari writes: > > > > >> Can you check if it works for you? I don't really know how to test this > > >> package. > > > > > > My apologies is that patch series does not apply. I have attached > > > another. > > > > Works for me; however, 0002-gnu-tcl-Use-tcl-tk-license.patch somehow > > includes a bit from my tclxml patch (to be resent as soon as this gets > > in) > > > > + gnu/packages/patches/tclxml-3.2-install.patch > > So I guess I actually *did* stay up too late ;) > > > > > Also, hunk #1 of 0003 failed to apply for me. > > This kept happening to me! It's one reason I just made a new patch > series from scratch, after manually addressing this failed hunk (your > copyright line, how strange that it would not apply). Okay, as discussed on IRC, I've pushed an updated patch series for you, starting at d29f64707. Thanks your contribution!