From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm-wlm.
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:51:29 +0100
Message-ID: <20160212175129.GB4929@debian>
References: <56bb7530.v5bvas2QpzoMjKMl%pjotr.public12@thebird.nl>
	<20160210220447.0917f1a1@openmailbox.org>
	<20160211081534.GA8987@thebird.nl>
	<20160212122042.GA14275@thebird.nl>
	<20160212123010.GA6019@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr>
	<20160212123141.GB14324@thebird.nl>
	<20160212125719.GA14615@thebird.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50031)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1aUHsX-0001A2-QC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:51:38 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1aUHsV-0001as-48
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:51:37 -0500
Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:36780)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1aUHsU-0001ad-Md
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:51:35 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160212125719.GA14615@thebird.nl>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Pjotr Prins <pjotr.public12@thebird.nl>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi Piotr,

"git am" fails on current master with this patch, claiming an error at
line 39:
+  #:use-module (gnu packages tcl)
+  #:use-module (gnu packages tls))
etc.

Did we not agree in the end that the package should simply be called slurm?

Could you please send a patch that applies to current master?

Thanks,

Andreas