From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: add lispf4
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:36:49 -0500
Message-ID: <20160210053649.GC18281@jasmine>
References: <87y4ax3cf2.fsf@grrlz.net> <87wpqgea7v.fsf@grrlz.net>
	<20160208003608.GA6080@jasmine> <877fifxxgg.fsf@grrlz.net>
	<20160208201442.GB2854@jasmine> <87twliekjc.fsf@grrlz.net>
	<20160209091632.0453f67c@debian-netbook> <87fux29nwi.fsf@grrlz.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41513)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1aTNSO-0000Cb-2j
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:36:53 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1aTNSK-0001Cu-OD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:36:52 -0500
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:40704)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1aTNSK-0001Cg-KR
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:36:48 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87fux29nwi.fsf@grrlz.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nils Gillmann <niasterisk@grrlz.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:30:21AM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
> > On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:31:51 +0100
> > Nils Gillmann <niasterisk@grrlz.net> wrote:

[...]

> >
> >> But now as I did guix pull and installed it from there, and do
> >> not run it inside guix environment, I encounter an error I did
> >> not see coming as it worked in the environment.

[...]

> > If you replace the install phase sometimes you have to change the permissions
> > yourself. Try searching for #o555.
> 
> Okay, thanks.
> I tried this but it doesn't change in the environment.
> On another system, in Debian, the permissions (in my users home)
> are:
> SYSATOMS: 644
> lispf4: 755
> BASIC.IMG 644
> 
> without changes, current lispf4 from master:
> niasterisk@khazad-dum ~/projects/guix_project/guix [env]$ ./pre-inst-env guix build lispf4
> /gnu/store/7rkw1rhn4ijap9b936waspki03260lpb-lispf4-0.0.0-1-174d876
> /gnu/store/871yzidvz2h4kpjx9sb116b0lshr88dn-lispf4-0.0.0-1-174d876-doc
> niasterisk@khazad-dum ~/projects/guix_project/guix [env]$ ls -al /gnu/store/7rkw1rhn4ijap9b936waspki03260lpb-lispf4-0.0.0-1-174d876/bin/
> total 200
> dr-xr-xr-x 2 root guixbuild  4096 Jan  1  1970 ./
> dr-xr-xr-x 3 root guixbuild  4096 Jan  1  1970 ../
> -r--r--r-- 4 root guixbuild 94972 Jan  1  1970 BASIC.IMG
> -r-xr-xr-x 8 root guixbuild 92088 Jan  1  1970 lispf4
> -r--r--r-- 8 root guixbuild  2105 Jan  1  1970 SYSATOMS
> 
> If I try 555 for both files, the output with the rights is below.
> I wonder, do I need to set it to 644 as it happens on the Debian
> system? Should I use guix system vm to test this? I expected that
> environment behaves like what pushed as a patch...

I'm not sure — did you figure out a solution to the problem with the
package?