Hello!

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:27:44PM +0100, Jessica Tallon wrote:
> I've finally got around to packaging the pass password manager.

That sounds interesting. Now I just wonder which password manager I would
prefer to use...

A few comments in addition to those already made.
As to the name, this is unclear; upstream uses "pass" a lot, so it could be
argued that it should be "pass". If in doubt, we go with the upstream tarball
name, and that is what I would do here.

I tried to build with gnupg-2.0 to make the tests pass, but this is not
enough.

I added a copyright line for you.

I would suggest a slightly modified description.

Adding util-linux to the native-inputs as suggested by Ludovic gets the
tests further: something happens at least, but they fail.

Since I tried out a few things, I realised I might as well send you my
modified version of the patch. Maybe you could continue from there and
examine the tests. If you are not happy with some of my modifications,
please feel free to discuss them.

Andreas