From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add libcanberra-gtk2. Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 16:25:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20160207162549.5a0d4a57@debian-netbook> References: <20160207111308.GA5011@debian> <1454852485-11533-1-git-send-email-fhmgufs@web.de> <20160207140339.GA17080@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/wvPUL=DEhrsdd/41Wbnfknd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSQHo-0003uy-1r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 09:26:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSQHk-0006Rs-Ph for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 09:25:59 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:32782) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSQHk-0006Rl-J8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 09:25:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160207140339.GA17080@debian> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Sig_/wvPUL=DEhrsdd/41Wbnfknd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 15:03:39 +0100 Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello, >=20 > this looks good to me. However, the package now cannot be installed toget= her > with the "normal" libcanberra package, as both contain > lib/libcanberra.so.0.2.5. I suppose that is okay? I assume this package wouldn't normally actually be installed in a user's profile, but I haven't worked much with gtk. > Would you mind sending a patch formatted with "git format-patch", after > committing to a local branch with the usual commit message? Then your > authorship will be preserved to posterity; otherwise I would look like > the author when I push. If you go to save the entire email it can be applied as a patch, otherwise = it fails, like I learned last week.=20 > And I suppose there will be more patches from you, so it is probably > worth the effort to get used to this workflow! >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Andreas >=20 -Efraim --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Sig_/wvPUL=DEhrsdd/41Wbnfknd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWt1PtAAoJEPTB05F+rO6TPcIP/154xNmdxa6qPrIM8pNoA+by hwRp2lKI6CikIuxtr4sxSuDu/z34LYEHveBXLte9z05QPBsuj2AYo5mHIy8i4wV8 4lX4W1W0r8CMwdTaW4BmsR3v+o/ESpHItABxXscv+Pmh35EHLBcms/YeyC84zzXq +FLzZMfiMgS+uSS5kDNRP7ym1IU/GzFl85N5RMOp/v1HLggJpJhZ/enyL15OB980 CdIcH4FGpc6Idxh915nlr9sNJcPvqtwSTwGMEILn9KFaQXV9JgTxHIsWGOMlTGqz 8Z+P+deWfR6L4c519mBmpPWYZOKnlz0A2qEzlt/K4fxvPC9qtzzjdrrDnuxSHhMk QyshG074RTCeNgywQIQv+gjnWDbZYQPDC/jbL3Mqfszcn+N3bs3mpgYZiao+SrFW vweCtGeO0LxSsae+225TprtRWSr2+Adq/iRYNsd6k141v5/+vLDhdXVCqYVswJ8O Dx1tpZ+Z7Dl2yfqtmSAVYcfa1Nw4aFihyennkN0rlAxsROVHoNfl8Xgi/67BCrLs TfMNHKAXU5EQi959X2lsfdMNjl+yNmNCqcSy9FrgPxypaj1KsbH1Ny2cpUfyPXgh n4lgzp63rBkriG/S2C3QP3hLvWdEwmTzrKsC9VcZW7vWiVSoI0PngsQWsIDpUEgA ReFARLofToO0xeGiOFMm =Mhqv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wvPUL=DEhrsdd/41Wbnfknd--