From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: R Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 20:54:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20160205195449.GA8899@debian> References: <20160204193924.GA8852@debian> <20160205100040.GA4213@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> <20160205190236.GA8063@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32881) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRmT4-0006xy-3N for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:54:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRmT0-0007en-0p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:54:58 -0500 Received: from mailrelay2.public.one.com ([91.198.169.125]:54311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRmSz-0007eh-KN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:54:53 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160205190236.GA8063@debian> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 08:02:36PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > Okay. I am giving it a try on arm right now. It looks like we should > then also drop "--with-lapack"; the documentation states that this has only > an effect when "--with-blas" is also given: > https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-admin.html#LAPACK > > If compilation succeeds on arm now, I will see whether a reference to lapack > is retained or not. Well, compilation succeeded! We will see whether this will also be the case on mips. And there is still a reference to lapack, so I am not touching the "--with-lapack" configure flag for now. Thanks a lot for your help! Andreas