From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fix CVE-2015-{8629, 8630, 8631}
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 21:32:25 -0500
Message-ID: <20160205023225.GA13364@jasmine>
References: <cover.1454633096.git.leo@famulari.name>
	<878u30x8lt.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47712)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1aRWCG-0000Ah-BC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 21:32:33 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1aRWCD-0007wX-4I
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 21:32:32 -0500
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:47140)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1aRWCC-0007vb-Uh
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 21:32:29 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <878u30x8lt.fsf@netris.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:13:18PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> 
> > These are upstream patches, also applied by Debian:
> > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-8629
> 
> Thanks for this, but I already updated mit-krb5 and applied fixes for
> these CVEs on the new 'security-updates' branch about 17 hours ago.
> 
> I'm sorry that your effort was wasted.

It's okay. Your version is much better!

> 
>      Mark