From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: torsocks 2.0 bug
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:33:56 +0100
Message-ID: <20160203193356.GA22324@debian>
References: <92c4a901a98ba83b4d21aa69921a942e@riseup.net>
	<20160129132809.1fe0c52e@debian-netbook>
	<8b802d8294362c03c133c28a7fb7e3c4@riseup.net>
	<878u32xhb7.fsf@gnu.org>
	<b62feea08936e5e6e6c02f616cf1bb97@riseup.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49635)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1aR3Bk-0005cY-FF
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:34:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1aR3Bg-0000gA-Ew
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:34:04 -0500
Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:56674)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1aR3Bg-0000g3-3I
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:34:00 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b62feea08936e5e6e6c02f616cf1bb97@riseup.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: swedebugia@riseup.net
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 07:08:32PM +0100, swedebugia@riseup.net wrote:
>       '(#:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
> +                  ; FIXME. this phase is still needed but fails. I dont
> +                  ; understand why. It works fine when done manually in an
> +                  ; environment.
>                    (add-before 'configure 'bootstrap
>                      (lambda _
> -                      (system* "autoreconf" "-vfi"))))))
> +                      (system* "autoreconf" "-i")

The problem is here. First of all, there was no need to drop the options "v"
and "f". But the real problem comes from dropping the parentheses.
So now what follows is part of the "lambda" function:

> +       ; FIXME. test_fd_passing fail.
> +       #:tests? #f)))))

And it ends with "#f", so the return value of the function is false, and the
phase fails.

I tried closing more parentheses, and then the build passes, but the tests
still fail. This would need to be investigated more.

Andreas