From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: gst-plugins-good Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:17:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20160121091743.16dc3679@debian-netbook> References: <20160120222320.6eddc452@debian-netbook> <20160120205308.GA8066@debian> <87oacfae9a.fsf@member.fsf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/kBI3wecGDK1PST9Q.nlJkut"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aM9VD-0001lp-Og for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 02:17:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aM9VA-0004a2-Hy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 02:17:55 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:38099) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aM9VA-0004ZZ-B3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 02:17:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87oacfae9a.fsf@member.fsf.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Sig_/kBI3wecGDK1PST9Q.nlJkut Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:54:25 +0800 iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6) wrote: > Andreas Enge writes: >=20 > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:23:20PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: =20 > >> ANYWAY, it turns out gstreamer 1.7.x is an unstable release, and 1.8.x= should > >> be coming out "soon". Extremely frusterating to bang my head against t= his for > >> so long and find out this is why. =20 > > > > Yes, this is why I had decided against updating it in Guix, the test fa= ilures > > on non-x86 notwithstanding. I think we should wait for the stable relea= se. > > What do you and others think? =20 > Sure, we should use stable releases of GStreamer, and 1.6.3 is just > comming out. I'll do the update later. >=20 >=20 > Sorry I didn't follow the issue. What break on master due to the update > of libvpx? Since hydra is busy with core-updates, I think we can work > on a separate branch, and pick it later after core-updates merged. Sorry, this was mostly me rambling. I tried back in November to update libv= px and that broke ffmpeg. Building locally I couldn't get gst-plugins-good to work with an updated libvpx. I was getting the impression that gst-plugins-good was "fragile" --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Sig_/kBI3wecGDK1PST9Q.nlJkut Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWoIYXAAoJEPTB05F+rO6T1BQP/RQdmtycVwyZ5C9ZXCWCElo8 aUnFCygLaWQOMXngq3m8aE/09Kxz8CStkhSZHppVFqdbxIagahHtKSwwYy6qiDAo TvQX50bzetDinmQ65BWlaLpGc0NVAl95/vwbKkE7bPhT/Hnp370VHkDr7mAzSwn3 OdLO2dzFjy40Ko2ALAO/Btfet+M5nweguWyNE6WO3XIEg0QpdQObqk2YI4/CqKCE LUBxka0oZhXHBkyAEuCpFmQANsQ/pjP7SKqt4/WIo1Z4ysCrUmCfDf8RK1zB1OQf Mi2hJOvL2+3IcF0LRZDRtuiQVthPViSXT+u3D0FjpxNxPMeFn4xMvYQhoQfwUjMs Ov7oK/643Oc7P2302DogDIETTNY1A4L4N1ySd0XoDHf6QnedFXe3QgL+yjXavHBN RL504fCUSVSKzo3An0IpYpK3Pcvk0qC1kwxW4BKT0ZheMqyg709h4Rqs199TcDRt LkJZzSLZjQrEk+a0JACnCE3yLjTHP8pkl9urKIhya+sWXspxqXjQTiGgpUSj+gkf +KzMFlj5oTB2bClWDIbzZz5uUh8rRTjYaimtWptn0NtdDZvq1LN5+tgbEj9fWMou sfyBN0JKK5qq6Vj2FmEurYKY1b63hebyZrSI21q/7a8acXeghO5ysumz3fBD0fAJ 8dz4JSjUDOPgxNG7cWsX =5xdA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/kBI3wecGDK1PST9Q.nlJkut--