From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: Python2-jsonschema fails
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 16:03:34 +0100
Message-ID: <20160118150334.GA9800@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr>
References: <20160118101556.GA4977@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr>
	<569CE0B4.5010307@gmail.com>
	<20160118164127.56e5b075@debian-netbook>
	<569CFC51.2000903@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45568)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1aLBLP-0002jD-3v
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:03:51 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1aLBLI-0006yb-Uv
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:03:47 -0500
Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:42400)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1aLBLI-0006yQ-LE
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:03:40 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <569CFC51.2000903@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 03:53:05PM +0100, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
> Yes, a bunch of packages will have to be rebuilt, but there is nothing
> we can do about this, I'm afraid.

I think what Efraim meant was that package-with-python2 does not work when
dealing with packages depending on python2-jsonschema. They will then not
depend on python2-jsonschema (built with python2-functools32), but on the
recursively rewritten (package-with-python2 python-jsonschema), which does
not include python2-functools32 in its inputs. We already have this rather
unpleasant problem around the numpy/matplotlib universe.

A cheating workaround would be to also add python-functools32 to the inputs
of python-jsonschema, assuming that it would be superfluous, but not
impossible, that is, not creating a conflict.

Andreas