From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add eSpeak Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:30:06 -0500 Message-ID: <20160112193006.GA26068@jasmine> References: <20160112055812.GA9240@jasmine> <20160112154818.GA7610@debian.grenet.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJ4dn-0004za-Rk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:30:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJ4dk-0004gi-LT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:30:03 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:55102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJ4dk-0004fS-F8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:30:00 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160112154818.GA7610@debian.grenet.fr> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:48:18PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:58:12AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > > So, in the future we should probably > > package espeak-ng as well, for the sake of users that need speech > > synthesis. It will conflict with espeak since the output binaries have > > the same names. > > From what you write, would it not be better to directly package espeak-ng > and to drop espeak? Eventually we should do that, but for now I think we should provide the espeak that users are familiar with. I am not sure how much the interface has changed in espeak-ng, if at all. I'm going to try it out soon. > > Andreas >