From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add eSpeak Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:48:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20160112154818.GA7610@debian.grenet.fr> References: <20160112055812.GA9240@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJ1BV-0006x5-BY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:48:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJ1BP-00073F-PM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:48:37 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.73]:58942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJ1BP-00070r-G2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:48:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160112055812.GA9240@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:58:12AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > So, in the future we should probably > package espeak-ng as well, for the sake of users that need speech > synthesis. It will conflict with espeak since the output binaries have > the same names. >From what you write, would it not be better to directly package espeak-ng and to drop espeak? Andreas