From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: [PATCH] Upgrade bedtools to 0.25.0. Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:44:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20160109134419.GA19838@thebird.nl> References: <5690ACF3.7010206@uq.edu.au> <20160109095442.GB4285@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHtoz-00067K-GG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 08:44:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHtow-0003j4-Ai for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 08:44:45 -0500 Received: from mail.thebird.nl ([95.154.246.10]:40452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHtow-0003ip-59 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 08:44:42 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160109095442.GB4285@debian> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:54:42AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 04:47:15PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > > A reasonably straightforward update. > > If I remember correctly, it is common practice to do the move to modify-phases > and the update in two separate commits. Sometimes I wonder if we are not being too prissy. Not exactly taxing to read it in one commit and we can trust the committer to test it. I see the point of agreed layouts and putting things in a *single* commit. Now, for a change, we need two. Pj.