From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Build failure on armhf Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:45:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20151230194503.GF15533@two.firstfloor.org> References: <20151212135721.GA18797@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Filipe Brandenburger Cc: Andreas Enge , linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, guix-devel@gnu.org List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org > What is the problem you are trying to solve? I guess he wants to build on that platform. Adding the numbers to syscall.c is also only needed if the necessary syscall numbers are missing in asm/unistd.h. It really was originally only for ancient distributions where the headers predate numa support. So updating that may also help. If your headers don't have numa support at all it may be also possible that the platform simply doesn't support NUMA. In that case building numactl is pointless. -Andi