From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:17:15 -0600 Message-ID: <20151228171715.5450cca0@openmailbox.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39092) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDlcy-0006jg-Bt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:11:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDlct-0004Oj-UT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:11:16 -0500 Received: from smtp21.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.55]:59927) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDlct-0004Of-Oj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:11:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:09 -0500 Leo Famulari wrote: > I think it would be better for this software synthesizer to be in > music.scm. > > Thoughts? IIRC, the original thought was that many GNU packages have their own modules, so this was done for cursynth as well. > Leo Famulari (1): > gnu: Move cursynth to (gnu packages music). > > gnu-system.am | 1 - > gnu/packages/cursynth.scm | 53 ----------------------------------------------- > gnu/packages/music.scm | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/cursynth.scm >