From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add mpv-minimal. Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 21:28:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20151205212843.249e6062@debian-netbook> References: <87d1um2o3f.fsf@gmail.com> <20151204171327.GD6556@debian> <87poykbui6.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/sjjXPKOFP7QJd2qEToSsui9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58515) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IVr-0000Tz-78 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:28:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IVn-0004oj-VS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:28:55 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:57596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IVn-0004oX-OJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:28:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87poykbui6.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Sig_/sjjXPKOFP7QJd2qEToSsui9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 05 Dec 2015 21:49:53 +0300 Alex Kost wrote: > Andreas Enge (2015-12-04 20:13 +0300) wrote: >=20 > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:08:36PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: =20 > >> I cry every time I see samba during updating my profile, so I wonder if > >> it is acceptable to have "mpv-minimal" which is less heavy on > >> dependencies. If so, perhaps the other people have ideas what inputs > >> may also be removed, thanks. =20 > > > > Or would it make sense to remove samba altogether from the regular mpv > > package? =20 >=20 > I'm personally for it, but there may be users who need mpv with samba > support, so I'm not sure if it is right. I thought that default Guix > packages should be full-featured, no? >=20 we could rename the current one mpv-network-support or something similar. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Sig_/sjjXPKOFP7QJd2qEToSsui9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWYzrrAAoJEPTB05F+rO6TV3YP/0WJPmai8/50UOLDFEk14nLQ 1nYrVo8gLDreT3gaI1yTGwr8fJNZRgZad9gU+IZrkxG13FfXvrQgQMWRBL/Tl3NO ehdgS0iCpmHKfwI9FiBxxpDbY4oO8isFRAPsWJA75KwN+4/Wa/5LG2ttLp9MaCNN CL6ou6c7JO/V8e0zLgQEV+Qrc8FEdIYEMtVxZNeENldbrN+35iUN9YTQOMxxFYXh Rbfsc6XcLhUKGYaOYeB8WU5JaHc2OtgVVGp61hesWRMJl0A2hUoYO0NjkHpmfwmu 3UBB2NInUfzE+ZiqTjH5BuL+yfIBnj3I4xk/cjoMoUybXnKQdMoLZQaahx79mdvm zfy3QDKpVy8tizQ66ls7ttbAMvJ8dJqlp1Hpqa3VDBjv+hB/UjQZJ71p6uusPU+w tsuviYik3rTURYdH7keKkjj2gCm8xkRQ8vDpWYwViJ+kmDhSqpgw6/A0r2f2/Wff ozhhXVajdyDNkVyICBXqjPa/jmIRNSmaHbWspJwjl5fGjeptf/U6lrgtjr3Vkxzw XeAxSSWVeoPL9LhWFmq9brOxvbdeJsOLJTVrwtVwPZFTlRFeQBAMwpb5VYKXcIc7 Awpc3BOyGiVaVEvJ4NvIWb6C+qzV8xBMWRaAbXyTgcNAdqwy1P10E6iBZM2SIN68 BHWaf80Y8wPYKY6a7aIP =CLcx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/sjjXPKOFP7QJd2qEToSsui9--