From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: Adding build status to the package list table Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 16:36:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20151121153609.GA9565@thebird.nl> References: <87poz6jgqi.fsf@gnu.org> <877flchhzg.fsf@gnu.org> <87poz4k4eh.fsf@gnu.org> <87610we16l.fsf@gnu.org> <878u5rjry5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0ADM-0006b8-7m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 10:36:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0ADI-0006F8-6y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 10:36:36 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878u5rjry5.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Roel Janssen Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 04:24:50PM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote: > > IMO it wouldn=E2=80=99t be very useful since the list is updated once= a day. >=20 > Ok. If we can instead fetch the status of all packages on all > architectures in one HTTP request (using javascript on the client-side)= , > would that be acceptable? The size of the build status information > should be about the same size as the list of packages. >=20 > For this we need a supporting API call of course. Sounds good to me as long as it also looks nice for people who switch JS off. Pj. --=20