From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: 80 new build failures for MIPS on the 'dbus-update' branch
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:48:49 +0200
Message-ID: <20151024074849.GA3817@debian>
References: <87wpuflr2v.fsf@netris.org> <20151022125648.GA7856@debian>
	<87vb9zhu64.fsf@member.fsf.org> <20151022144329.GA9655@debian>
	<20151023093015.GA17793@debian> <8737x1yr3j.fsf@member.fsf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38820)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZptZW-0004jW-W2
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 03:49:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZptZU-0005F9-GS
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 03:49:02 -0400
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:56237)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZptZU-0005F3-6x
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 03:49:00 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8737x1yr3j.fsf@member.fsf.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= <iyzsong@member.fsf.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:48:00AM +0800, 宋文武 wrote:
> I remove rest from gtk+, build successful locally (x86_64), and pushed.
> Are you fails on mips64el?

No, also on x86_64. I am not sure what happened, maybe I made a mistake
somewhere.

Andreas