From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ghc-unix-time.
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:22:43 +0200
Message-ID: <20151022162243.GA10764@debian>
References: <1445483479-19104-1-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
	<1445503671-30014-1-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
	<1445503671-30014-18-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
	<87oafqq588.fsf@denknerd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41515)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZpIdq-0002PT-Ia
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:23:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZpIdl-0004Mb-N7
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:23:02 -0400
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:50411)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZpIdl-0004MO-E2
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:22:57 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87oafqq588.fsf@denknerd.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Paul van der Walt <paul@denknerd.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 05:43:03PM +0200, Paul van der Walt wrote:
> Right, i see what you mean.  I agree that it'd probably be the right
> thing to do.  However, to expedite the merge of wip-haskell-… i propose
> that i take the solution of ghc-x11 and apply it to the relevant
> packages, and then look at fixing the haskell-build-system.  At that
> point we can simply remove the phases introduced to work around this
> deficiency.
> Do you think that's acceptable, or is it imperative* that we first solve
> the problem in the build system?
> I prefer the incremental approach (but i am not an objective outside
> observer).

I think it sounds reasonable, and would save us from further iterations
of 150 commits sent to the mailing list :-)  Seriously, I am impressed
by your git juggling.

Andreas